|
Post by Admin on Apr 6, 2020 19:45:51 GMT
A population genomic history of the Eurasian steppe
Description The Eurasian steppe, stretching about 8000 kilometres from Hungary and Romania in the west to Mongolia and western China in the east, is culturally among the most dynamic areas in the world. In the past four millennia, it has been variously dominated by Iranian-, Turkic- and Mongolic-speaking groups, and its temperate grasslands have been a crossroad for extensive movements of peoples, goods, and ideas between Europe, Siberia, South and East Asia. In order to understand the genetic history of the Eurasian steppe populations, we have sequenced 137 ancient genomes (~1X average coverage) spanning a 4000 years time series. We also genotyped 502 individuals from 16 contemporary self-reported ethnicities. We find evidence of a highly dynamic population history; the Iranian-speaking Scythians that dominated the Eurasian steppe throughout the Iron Age (~1 millennium BCE to common era) emerged following admixture between Late Bronze Age herders of western Eurasian descent and East Asian hunter-gatherers. The steppe nomads later further admixed with Turkic-speaking groups of East Asian ancestry that spread westward across the steppe in multiple waves: firstly, the Xiongnu confederations that emerged in Mongolia around the 3nd/2nd century BC; secondly, the Huns (4-5th century CE), infected with plague basal to the Justinian Y. pestis strain that destabilized the eastern Roman Empire in the 6th century CE; and thirdly during various short term dynasties, including the Mongol Empire of Genghis Khan and his descendants. These recent historical events transformed the Eurasian steppe populations from being Indo-European speakers of largely western Eurasian ancestry to the present-day Turkic-speaking groups, primarily of East Asian ancestry.
Ancient Eurasian Steppe selected Y and mtDNA haplogroups and Gedmatch IDs : Scythians, Xiongnu, Huns, Turks, and Mongols: Sample ID ENA / YFull ID Population Region Age BP YFull tree mtDNA v17 / Ian Logan Gedmatch base count Gigabases 1240k SNPs 1240k % Eurogenes Global25 DA2 ERS2374286 Tagar Siberia, Tungus & Eastern Steppe 2817 R-Z2125 N1a1a1a1 Z511676 3,273,661,759 3.2 680153 56.75% DA4 ERS2374288 Tagar Siberia, Tungus & Eastern Steppe 2817 Q-L933 H5a1+152 Z382195 2,306,999,573 2.3 540100 45.07% DA8 ERS2374292 Tagar Siberia, Tungus & Eastern Steppe 2817 female U2e1h Z330228 5,653,824,563 5.6 897817 74.92% DA13 ERS2374296 CentralSaka Central steppe 2577 R-YP1456 A+152+16362+16189 Z150104 4,780,376,226 4.7 845581 70.56% DA16 ERS2374299 CentralSaka Central steppe 2564 R-YP1456 U2e2 3,237,444,368 3.2 692269 57.76% DA19 ERS2374302 OutCentralSaka Central steppe 2629 E-Y31991 1,452,197,336 1.4 DA20 ERS2374303 Nomad_Hun-Sarmatian Central steppe 2233 Q-YP771 1,599,588,830 1.5 DA23 ERS2374304 Kipchak Central steppe 851 C-Y11990 F1b1b Z577705 6,347,213,506 6.3 931251 77.71% DA27 ERS2374306 Nomad_Hun-Sarmatian Central steppe 1542 R-Z93 C4b1 Z419959 6,184,555,509 6.1 919361 76.71% DA28 ERS2374307 GoldenHordeAsian Central steppe 700 C-Y4541 D4m2 Z027433 12,254,234,020 12.2 1105378 92.23% yes DA29 ERS2374308 GoldenHordeEuro Central steppe 700 R-YP575 I1 Z933098 3,450,302,155 3.4 706691 58.97% DA30 ERS2374309 Sarmatian Central steppe 1961 I-A427 U4 Z032016 3,657,510,477 3.6 755111 63.01% DA31 ERS2374310 LchashenMetsamor Caucasus 3207 I-Y16419 1,023,774,977 1 DA38 ERS2374312 XiongNu_WE Siberia, Tungus & Eastern Steppe 2043 female D4b2b4 Z777394 8,674,455,257 8.6 1008889 84.18% DA39 ERS2374313 XiongNu Siberia, Tungus & Eastern Steppe 1960 R-L645 N9a2'4'5'11 Z780597 6,185,727,031 6.1 927452 77.39% DA41 ERS2374314 XiongNu_WE Siberia, Tungus & Eastern Steppe 2179 R-PH200 G3a3 Z877352 2,401,321,602 2.4 584533 48.77% DA43 ERS2374315 XiongNu (Han Chinese) Siberia, Tungus & Eastern Steppe 1994 O-F4062 D4a DA45 ERS2374316 XiongNu (Han Chinese) Siberia, Tungus & Eastern Steppe 1994 O-F871 D4b2b2b Z031856 26,835,346,490 26.8 1172282 97.82% yes DA47 ERS2374317 TianShanSaka Tian Shan 2065 Q-L330 C4 Z232502 4,644,920,108 4.6 810722 67.65% DA54 ERS2374324 TianShanHun Tian Shan 1595 Q-L715 629,033,238 0.6 DA56 ERS2374326 OutTianShanSaka Tian Shan 2049 R-Z2125 HV6 Z042473 4,618,712,692 4.6 813744 67.90% DA57 ERS2374327 TianShanSaka Tian Shan 2070 J-Y13534 D4j8 Z789153 3,112,606,382 3.1 651186 54.34% DA58 ERS2374328 TianShanSaka Tian Shan 2065 J-Z7706 W1c Z871644 2,652,445,118 2.6 588744 49.13% DA59 ERS2374329 TianShanSaka Tian Shan 2140 J-Y13534 Z959198 2,183,502,049 2.1 DA65 ERS2374331 TianShanHun Tian Shan 1525 E-V22 Z019511 860,138,812 0.8 DA74 ERS2374339 TianShanHun Tian Shan 1514 Q-L713 H7b Z384293 2,839,511,391 2.8 620589 51.78% DA81 ERS2374341 TianShanHun Tian Shan 1684 R-PH200 A16 Z855800 6,484,540,360 6.4 934047 77.94% DA85 ERS2374343 TianShanHun Tian Shan 1700 L-Y31213 U4 Z710382 5,729,018,985 5.7 903693 75.41% yes DA86 ERS2374344 Turk Tian Shan 1468 Q-L715 1,607,591,458 1.6 DA87 ERS2374345 Kimak Central steppe 1280 R-Y14051 833,049,071 0.8 DA92 ERS2374347 Nomad_IA Central steppe 1923 R-Y20750 1,137,146,355 1.1 DA93 ERS2374348 Nomad_Med Central steppe 1129 R-Y14051 D4j8 DA95 ERS2374350 Nomad_HP Central steppe 1604 N-Y16220 D4b1 Z423957 6,185,264,272 6.1 902819 75.33% DA98 ERS2374352 TianShanHun Tian Shan 1831 N-TAT 1,309,862,758 1.3 DA100 ERS2374354 TianShanHun Tian Shan 1629 R-S23592 C4b1 Z906895 6,116,693,105 6.1 914767 76.33% DA101 ERS2374355 TianShanHun Tian Shan 1701 R-YP1456 U5a1b1e Z136645 10,585,206,870 10.5 1070740 89.34% yes DA105 ERS2374357 TianShanHun Tian Shan 1769 Q-L715 1,705,407,021 1.7 DA106 ERS2374358 Nomad_Med Tian Shan 739 C-Y12825 2,026,349,944 2 DA111 ERS2374359 HallstattBylany Europe 2758 R-P312 H6a1a Z302274 2,671,374,961 2.6 595279 49.67% yes DA117 ERS2374362 Nomad_His Tian Shan 145 G-Z6553 H6a1b Z263746 3,624,705,231 3.6 727524 60.71% DA119 ERS2374364 Poprad Europe 1600 R-U106 U4b3 Z371280 2,182,870,861 2.1 541006 45.14% yes DA124 ERS2374367 Nomad_Med Tian Shan 1271 J-PF4993 852,327,589 0.8 DA125 ERS2374368 Kangju Tian Shan 1738 T-Y13279 655,372,127 0.6 DA126 ERS2374369 Nomad_Med Tian Shan 985 R-CTS6 F2c1 Z580575 782,408,344 0.7 DA127 ERS2374370 OutTianShanHun Tian Shan 1634 Q-YP4500 1,551,251,097 1.5 DA129 ERS2374372 Nomad_IA Tian Shan 2342 R-Y16006 W3b Z189658 3,411,629,171 3.4 693228 57.84% DA134 ERS2374374 Sarmatian Caspian steppe 1933 R-Y52 1,455,646,198 1.4 DA141 ERS2374377 Sarmatian Caspian steppe 1933 Q-YP771 1,559,651,996 1.5 DA142 ERS2374378 Nomad_Med Caspian steppe 1400-1100 R-Z2124 J1c5a1 Z759882 3,647,404,795 3.6 712108 59.42% DA161 ERS2374384 Alan Caucasus 1500-1100 Q-L330 451,597,010 0.4 DA162 ERS2374385 Alan Caucasus 1900-1500 Q-YP4000 H13a2 Z923991 6,457,251,483 6.4 929425 77.55% DA171 ERS2374387 NLithuania Europe 1900-1300 N-L1025 Z713550 422,426,204 0.4 DA177 ERS2374388 Nomad_HP Central steppe 1800-1500 female D4j1b Z035582 8,061,357,150 8 1013995 84.61% DA179 ERS2374389 Kipchak Central steppe 1000-800 G-PH1780 D4 Z682973 4,715,215,936 4.7 818512 68.30% DA190 ERS2374392 SaltovoMayaki Caspian steppe 1283 G-Z6653 223,561,164 0.2 DA198 ERS2374397 HungarianScythian Europe 2342 G-PF3378 H2a2a Z923991 2,081,372,252 2 DA203 ERS2374401 Karakhanid Central steppe 1000-700 J-Z7706 2,197,567,848 2.1 DA204 ERS2374402 Karakhanid Central steppe 940 J-Y14698 A+152+16362 Z637314 3,179,259,939 3.1 669624 55.87% DA206 ERS2374404 Kangju Central steppe 1689 R-S23592 HV13b Z547295 6,177,160,554 6.1 919803 76.75% DA221 ERS2374408 Nomad_IA Tian Shan 2565 Q-L332 J1b1a1 Z697149 9,219,835,963 9.2 1042001 86.95% DA222 ERS2374409 Karluk Tian Shan 1200-1000 J-Z7706 A25 Z342597 10,537,415,575 10.5 1170454 97.66% yes DA223 ERS2374410 Wusun Tian Shan 2274 R-Z93* J1c5a Z698544 8,533,948,675 8.5 1025678 85.58% DA228 ERS2374414 Turk Central steppe 1400-1100 O-F714 A15c Z845678 8,157,320,767 8.1 1003635 83.74% DA230 ERS2374416 Karluk Tian Shan 1200-1000 J-Z7706 F1b1e Z710694 3,946,964,883 3.9 742336 61.94% DA231 ERS2374417 Andronovo Central steppe 3372 C-Y11990 1,801,430,878 1.8 DA243 ERS2374418 Alan Caucasus 1533 R-S23592 W1c Z143419 9,628,728,889 9.6 1065055 88.87% DA343 ERS2374419 Glazkovo Siberia, Tungus & Eastern Steppe 4597-3726 Q-YP1102 1,933,010,864 1.9 DA353 ERS2374420 Glazkovo Siberia, Tungus & Eastern Steppe 4597-3726 Q-YP4004 526,157,522 0.5 DA356 ERS2374421 Glazkovo Siberia, Tungus & Eastern Steppe 4597-3726 Q-YP1102 1,294,581,270 1.2 DA361 ERS2374422 Glazkovo Siberia, Tungus & Eastern Steppe 4597-3726 Q-YP4004 1,815,786,553 1.8 DA385 ERS2374330 TianShanHun Tian Shan 1466 R-S23592 H13a2a Z610860 6,899,764,335 6.8 953822 79.59%
|
|
|
Post by Admin on Jul 8, 2020 19:18:58 GMT
The first horse herders and the impact of early Bronze Age steppe expansions into Asia Science 29 Jun 2018: Vol. 360, Issue 6396, eaar7711 DOI: 10.1126/science.aar7711 Abstract The Yamnaya expansions from the western steppe into Europe and Asia during the Early Bronze Age (~3000 BCE) are believed to have brought with them Indo-European languages and possibly horse husbandry. We analyzed 74 ancient whole-genome sequences from across Inner Asia and Anatolia and show that the Botai people associated with the earliest horse husbandry derived from a hunter-gatherer population deeply diverged from the Yamnaya. Our results also suggest distinct migrations bringing West Eurasian ancestry into South Asia before and after, but not at the time of, Yamnaya culture. We find no evidence of steppe ancestry in Bronze Age Anatolia from when Indo-European languages are attested there. Thus, in contrast to Europe, Early Bronze Age Yamnaya-related migrations had limited direct genetic impact in Asia. Ancient steppes for human equestrians The Eurasian steppes reach from the Ukraine in Europe to Mongolia and China. Over the past 5000 years, these flat grasslands were thought to be the route for the ebb and flow of migrant humans, their horses, and their languages. de Barros Damgaard et al. probed whole-genome sequences from the remains of 74 individuals found across this region. Although there is evidence for migration into Europe from the steppes, the details of human movements are complex and involve independent acquisitions of horse cultures. Furthermore, it appears that the Indo-European Hittite language derived from Anatolia, not the steppes. The steppe people seem not to have penetrated South Asia. Genetic evidence indicates an independent history involving western Eurasian admixture into ancient South Asian peoples. Science, this issue p. eaar7711 Structured Abstract INTRODUCTION According to the commonly accepted “steppe hypothesis,” the initial spread of Indo-European (IE) languages into both Europe and Asia took place with migrations of Early Bronze Age Yamnaya pastoralists from the Pontic-Caspian steppe. This is believed to have been enabled by horse domestication, which revolutionized transport and warfare. Although in Europe there is much support for the steppe hypothesis, the impact of Early Bronze Age Western steppe pastoralists in Asia, including Anatolia and South Asia, remains less well understood, with limited archaeological evidence for their presence. Furthermore, the earliest secure evidence of horse husbandry comes from the Botai culture of Central Asia, whereas direct evidence for Yamnaya equestrianism remains elusive. RATIONALE We investigated the genetic impact of Early Bronze Age migrations into Asia and interpret our findings in relation to the steppe hypothesis and early spread of IE languages. We generated whole-genome shotgun sequence data (~1 to 25 X average coverage) for 74 ancient individuals from Inner Asia and Anatolia, as well as 41 high-coverage present-day genomes from 17 Central Asian ethnicities. RESULTS We show that the population at Botai associated with the earliest evidence for horse husbandry derived from an ancient hunter-gatherer ancestry previously seen in the Upper Paleolithic Mal’ta (MA1) and was deeply diverged from the Western steppe pastoralists. They form part of a previously undescribed west-to-east cline of Holocene prehistoric steppe genetic ancestry in which Botai, Central Asians, and Baikal groups can be modeled with different amounts of Eastern hunter-gatherer (EHG) and Ancient East Asian genetic ancestry represented by Baikal_EN. Model-based admixture proportions for selected ancient and present-day individuals, assuming K = 6, shown with their corresponding geographical locations. Ancient groups are represented by larger admixture plots, with those sequenced in the present work surrounded by black borders and others used for providing context with blue borders. Present-day South Asian groups are represented by smaller admixture plots with dark red borders. In Anatolia, Bronze Age samples, including from Hittite speaking settlements associated with the first written evidence of IE languages, show genetic continuity with preceding Anatolian Copper Age (CA) samples and have substantial Caucasian hunter-gatherer (CHG)–related ancestry but no evidence of direct steppe admixture. In South Asia, we identified at least two distinct waves of admixture from the west, the first occurring from a source related to the Copper Age Namazga farming culture from the southern edge of the steppe, who exhibit both the Iranian and the EHG components found in many contemporary Pakistani and Indian groups from across the subcontinent. The second came from Late Bronze Age steppe sources, with a genetic impact that is more localized in the north and west. CONCLUSION Our findings reveal that the early spread of Yamnaya Bronze Age pastoralists had limited genetic impact in Anatolia as well as Central and South Asia. As such, the Asian story of Early Bronze Age expansions differs from that of Europe. Intriguingly, we find that direct descendants of Upper Paleolithic hunter-gatherers of Central Asia, now extinct as a separate lineage, survived well into the Bronze Age. These groups likely engaged in early horse domestication as a prey-route transition from hunting to herding, as otherwise seen for reindeer. Our findings further suggest that West Eurasian ancestry entered South Asia before and after, rather than during, the initial expansion of western steppe pastoralists, with the later event consistent with a Late Bronze Age entry of IE languages into South Asia. Finally, the lack of steppe ancestry in samples from Anatolia indicates that the spread of the earliest branch of IE languages into that region was not associated with a major population migration from the steppe.
|
|
|
Post by Admin on Jul 9, 2020 19:53:27 GMT
The vast grasslands making up the Eurasian steppe zones, from Ukraine through Kazakhstan to Mongolia, have served as a crossroad for human population movements during the last 5000 years (1–3), but the dynamics of its human occupation—especially of the earliest period—remain poorly understood. The domestication of the horse at the transition from the Copper Age to the Bronze Age, ~3000 BCE, enhanced human mobility (4, 5) and may have triggered waves of migration. According to the “steppe hypothesis,” this expansion of groups in the western steppe related to the Yamnaya and Afanasievo cultures was associated with the spread of Indo-European (IE) languages into Europe and Asia (1, 2, 4, 6). The peoples who formed the Yamnaya and Afanasievo cultures belonged to the same genetically homogeneous population, with direct ancestry attributed to both Copper Age (CA) western steppe pastoralists, descending primarily from the European Eastern hunter-gatherers (EHG) of the Mesolithic and to Caucasian groups (1, 2) related to Caucasus hunter-gatherers (CHG) (7). Within Europe, the steppe hypothesis is supported by the reconstruction of Proto-IE (PIE) vocabulary (8), as well as by archaeological and genomic evidence of human mobility and Early Bronze Age (3000 to 2500 BCE) cultural dynamics (9). For Asia, however, several conflicting interpretations have long been debated. These concern the origins and genetic composition of the local Asian populations encountered by the Yamnaya- and Afanasievo-related populations, including the groups associated with Botai, a site that offers the earliest evidence for horse husbandry (10). In contrast, the more western sites that have been supposed by some to reflect the use of horses in the Copper Age (4) lack direct evidence of domesticated horses. Even the later use of horses among Yamnaya pastoralists has been questioned by some (11) despite the key role of horses in the steppe hypothesis. Furthermore, genetic, archaeological, and linguistic hypotheses diverge on the timing and processes by which steppe genetic ancestry and the IE languages spread into South Asia (4, 6, 12). Similarly, in present-day Turkey, the emergence of the Anatolian IE language branch, including the Hittite language, remains enigmatic, with conflicting hypotheses about population migrations leading to its emergence in Anatolia (4, 13). Ancient genomes inform upon human movements within Asia We analyzed whole-genome sequence data of 74 ancient humans (14, 15) (tables S1 to S3) ranging from the Mesolithic (~9000 BCE) to Medieval times, spanning ~5000 km across Eastern Europe, Central Asia, and Western Asia (Anatolia) (Fig. 1). Our genome data includes 3 Copper Age individuals (~3500 to 3300 BCE) from Botai in northern Kazakhstan (Botai_CA; 13.6X, 3.7X, and 3X coverage, respectively); 1 Early Bronze Age (~2900 BCE) Yamnaya sample from Karagash, Kazakhstan (16) (YamnayaKaragash_EBA; 25.2X); 1 Mesolithic (~9000 BCE) EHG from Sidelkino, Russia (SidelkinoEHG_ML; 2.9X); 2 Early/Middle Bronze Age (~2200 BCE) central steppe individuals (~4200 BP) (CentralSteppe_EMBA; 4.5X and 9.1X average coverage, respectively) from burials at Sholpan and Gregorievka that display cultural similarities to Yamnaya and Afanasievo (12); 19 individuals of the Bronze Age (~2500 to 2000 BCE) Okunevo culture of the Minusinsk Basin in the Altai region (Okunevo_EMBA; ~1X average coverage; 0.1 to 4.6X); 31 Baikal hunter-gatherer genomes (~1X average coverage; 0.2 to 4.5X) from the cis-Baikal region bordering on Mongolia and ranging in time from the Early Neolithic (~5200 to 4200 BCE; Baikal_EN) to the Early Bronze Age (~2200 to 1800 BCE; Baikal_EBA); 4 Copper Age individuals (~3300 to 3200 BCE; Namazga_CA; ~1X average coverage; 0.1 to 2.2X) from Kara-Depe and Geoksur in the Kopet Dag piedmont strip of Turkmenistan, affiliated with the period III cultural layers at Namazga-Depe (fig. S1), plus 1 Iron Age individual (Turkmenistan_IA; 2.5X) from Takhirbai in the same area dated to ~800 BCE; and 12 individuals from Central Turkey (figs. S2 to S4), spanning from the Early Bronze Age (~2200 BCE; Anatolia_EBA) to the Iron Age (~600 BCE; Anatolia_IA), and including 5 individuals from presumed Hittite-speaking settlements (~1600 BCE; Anatolia_MLBA), and 2 individuals dated to the Ottoman Empire (1500 CE; Anatolia_Ottoman; 0.3 to 0.9X). All the population labels including those referring to previously published ancient samples are listed in table S4 for contextualization. Additionally, we sequenced 41 high-coverage (30X) present-day Central Asian genomes, representing 17 self-declared ethnicities (fig. S5), and collected and genotyped 140 individuals from five IE-speaking populations in northern Pakistan. Fig. 1 Geographic location and dates of ancient samples. (A) Location of the 74 samples from the steppe, Lake Baikal region, Turkmenistan, and Anatolia analyzed in the present study. MA1, KK1, and Xiongnu_IA were previously published. Geographical background colors indicate the western steppe (pink), central steppe (orange) and eastern steppe (gray). (B) Timeline in years before present (BP) for each sample. ML, Mesolithic; EHG, Eastern hunter-gatherer; EN, Early Neolithic; LN, Late Neolithic; CA, Copper Age; EBA, Early Bronze Age; EMBA, Early/Middle Bronze Age; MLBA, Middle/Late Bronze Age; IA, Iron Age. Tests indicated that the contamination proportion of the data was negligible (14) (see table S1), and we removed related individuals from frequency-based statistics (fig. S6 and table S5). Our high-coverage Yamnaya genome from Karagash is consistent with previously published Yamnaya and Afanasievo genomes, and our Sidelkino genome is consistent with previously published EHG genomes, on the basis that there is no statistically significant deviation from 0 of D statistics of the form D(Test, Mbuti; SidelkinoEHG_ML, EHG) (fig. S7) or of the form D(Test, Mbuti; YamnayaKaragash_EBA, Yamnaya) (fig. S8; additional D statistics shown in figs. S9 to S12). Genetic origins of local Inner Asian populations In the Early Bronze Age, ~3000 BCE, the Afanasievo culture was formed in the Altai region by people related to the Yamnaya, who migrated 3000 km across the central steppe from the western steppe (1) and are often identified as the ancestors of the IE-speaking Tocharians of first-millennium northwestern China (4, 6). At this time, the region they passed through was populated by horse hunter-herders (4, 10, 17), while further east the Baikal region hosted groups that had remained hunter-gatherers since the Paleolithic (18–22). Subsequently, the Okunevo culture replaced the Afanasievo culture. The genetic origins and relationships of these peoples have been largely unknown (23, 24). To address these issues, we characterized the genomic ancestry of the local Inner Asian populations around the time of the Yamnaya and Afanasievo expansion. Comparing our ancient samples to a range of present-day and ancient samples with principal components analysis (PCA), we find that the Botai_CA, CentralSteppe_EMBA, Okunevo_EMBA, and Baikal populations (Baikal_EN and Baikal_EBA) are distributed along a previously undescribed genetic cline. This cline extends from the EHG of the western steppe to the Bronze Age (~2000 to 1800 BCE) and Neolithic (~5200 to 4200 BCE) hunter-gatherers of Lake Baikal in Central Asia, which are located on the PCA plot close to modern East Asians and two Early Neolithic (~5700 BCE) Devil’s Gate samples (25) (Fig. 2 and fig. S13). In accordance with their position along the west-to-east gradient in the PCA, increased East Asian ancestry is evident in ADMIXTURE model-based clustering (Fig. 3 and figs. S14 and S15) and by D statistics for Sholpan and Gregorievka (CentralSteppe_EMBA) and Okunevo_EMBA, relative to Botai_CA and the Baikal_EN sample: D(Baikal_EN, Mbuti; Botai_CA, Okunevo_EMBA) = –0.025 Z = –12; D(Baikal_EN, Mbuti; Botai_CA, Sholpan) = –0.028 Z = –8.34; D(Baikal_EN, Mbuti; Botai_CA, Gregorievka) = –0.026 Z = –7.1. The position of this cline suggests that the central steppe Bronze Age populations all form a continuation of the Ancient North Eurasian (ANE) population, previously known from the 24,000-year-old Mal’ta (MA1), the 17,000-year-old AG-2 (26), and the ~14,700-year-old AG-3 (27) individuals from Siberia. Fig. 2 Principal component analyses using ancient and present-day genetic data. (A) PCA of ancient and modern Eurasian populations. The ancient steppe ancestry cline from EHG to Baikal_EN is visible at the top outside present-day variation, whereas the YamnayaKaragash_EBA sample has additional CHG ancestry and locates to the left with other Yamnaya and Afanasievo samples. Additionally, a shift in ancestry is observed between the Baikal_EN and Baikal_LNBA, consistent with an increase in ANE-related ancestry in Baikal_LNBA. (B) PCA estimated with a subset of Eurasian ancient individuals from the steppe, Iran, and Anatolia as well as present-day South Asian populations. PC1 and PC2 broadly reflect west-east and north-south geography, respectively. Multiple clines of different ancestry are seen in the South Asians, with a prominent cline even within Dravidians in the direction of the Namazga_CA group, which is positioned above Iranian Neolithic in the direction of EHG. In the later Turkmenistan_IA sample, this shift is more pronounced and toward Steppe EBA and MLBA. The Anatolia_CA, EBA, and MLBA samples are all between Anatolia Neolithic and CHG, not in the direction of steppe samples.
|
|
|
Post by Admin on Jul 10, 2020 7:50:19 GMT
Fig. 3 Model-based clustering analysis of present-day and ancient individuals assuming K = 6 ancestral components. The main ancestry components at K = 6 correlate well with CHG (turquoise), a major component of Iran_N, Namazga_CA and South Asian clines; EHG (pale blue), a component of the steppe cline and present in South Asia; East Asia (yellow ochre), the other component of the steppe cline also in Tibeto-Burman South Asian populations; South Indian (pink), a core component of South Asian populations; Anatolian_N (purple), an important component of Anatolian Bronze Age and Steppe_MLBA; Onge (dark pink) forms its own component. To investigate ancestral relationships between these populations, we used coalescent modeling with the momi (Moran Models for Inference) program (28) (Fig. 4, figs. S16 to S22, and tables S6 to S11). This exploits the full joint-site frequency spectrum and can separate genetic drift into divergence-time and population-size components, in comparison to PCA, admixture, and qpAdm approaches, which are based on pairwise covariances. We find that Botai_CA, CentralSteppe_EMBA, Okunevo_EMBA, and Baikal populations are deeply separated from other ancient and present-day populations and are best modeled as mixtures in different proportions of ANE ancestry and an Ancient East Asian (AEA) ancestry component represented by Baikal_EN, with mixing times dated to ~5000 BCE. Although some modern Siberian samples lie under the Baikal samples in Fig. 2A, these are separated out in a more limited PCA, involving just those populations and the ancient samples (fig. S23). Our momi model infers that the ANE lineage separated ~15,000 years ago in the Upper Paleolithic from the EHG lineage to the west, with no independent drift assigned to MA1. This suggests that MA1 may represent their common ancestor. Similarly, the AEA lineage to the east also separated ~15,000 years ago, with the component that leads to Baikal_EN and the AEA component of the steppe separating from the lineage leading to present-day East Asian populations represented by Han Chinese (figs. S19 to S21). The ANE and AEA lineages themselves are estimated as having separated approximately 40,000 years ago, relatively soon after the peopling of Eurasia by modern humans. Fig. 4 Demographic model of 10 populations inferred by maximizing the likelihood of the site frequency spectrum (implemented in momi). We used 300 parametric bootstrap simulations (shown in gray transparency) to estimate uncertainty. Bootstrap estimates for the bias and standard deviation of admixture proportions are listed beneath their point estimates. The uncertainty may be underestimated here, due to simplifications or additional uncertainty in the model specification. Because the ANE MA1 sample comes from the same cis-Baikal region as the AEA-derived Neolithic samples analyzed here, we document evidence for a population replacement between the Paleolithic and the Neolithic in this region. Furthermore, we observe a shift in genetic ancestry between the Early Neolithic (Baikal_EN) and the Late Neolithic/Bronze Age hunter-gatherers (Baikal_LNBA) (Fig. 2A), with the Baikal_LNBA cluster showing admixture from an ANE-related source. We estimate the ANE related ancestry in the Baikal_LNBA to be ~5 to 11% (qpAdm) (table S12) (2), using MA1 as a source of ANE, Baikal_EN as a source of AEA, and a set of six outgroups. However, neither MA1 nor any of the other steppe populations lie in the direction of Baikal_LNBA from Baikal_EN on the PCA plot (fig. S23). This suggests that the new ANE ancestry in Baikal_LNBA stems from an unsampled source. Given that this source may have harbored East Asian ancestry, the contribution may be larger than 10%. These serial changes in the Baikal populations are reflected in Y-chromosome lineages (Fig. 5A, figs. S24 to S27, and tables S13 and S14). MA1 carries the R haplogroup, whereas the majority of Baikal_EN males belong to N lineages, which were widely distributed across Northern Eurasia (29), and the Baikal_LNBA males all carry Q haplogroups, as do most of the Okunevo_EMBA as well as some present-day Central Asians and Siberians. Mitochondrial haplogroups show less turnover (Fig. 5B and table S15), which could either indicate male-mediated admixture or reflect bottlenecks in the male population. Fig. 5 Y-chromosome and mitochondrial lineages identified in ancient and present-day individuals. (A) Maximum likelihood Y-chromosome phylogenetic tree estimated with data from 109 high-coverage samples. Dashed lines represent the upper bound for the inclusion of 42 low-coverage ancient samples in specific Y-chromosome clades on the basis of the lineages identified. (B) Maximum likelihood mitochondrial phylogenetic tree estimated with 182 present-day and ancient individuals. The phylogenies displayed were restricted to a subset of clades relevant to the present work. Columns represent archaeological groups analyzed in the present study, ordered by time, and colored areas indicate membership of the major Y-chromosome and mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) haplogroups. The deep population structure among the local populations in Inner Asia around the Copper Age/Bronze Age transition is in line with distinct origins of central steppe hunter-herders related to Botai of the central steppe and those related to Altaian hunter-gatherers of the eastern steppe (30). Furthermore, this population structure, which is best described as part of the ANE metapopulation, persisted within Inner Asia from the Upper Paleolithic to the end of the Early Bronze Age. In the Baikal region, the results show that at least two genetic shifts occurred: first, a complete population replacement of the Upper Paleolithic hunter-gatherers belonging to the ANE by Early Neolithic communities of Ancient East Asian ancestry, and second, an admixture event between the latter and additional members of the ANE clade, occurring during the 1500-year period that separates the Neolithic from the Early Bronze Age. These genetic shifts complement previously observed severe cultural changes in the Baikal region (18–22).
|
|
|
Post by Admin on Jul 10, 2020 23:52:43 GMT
Relevance for history of horse domestication The earliest unambiguous evidence for horse husbandry is from the Copper Age Botai hunter-herder culture of the central steppe in Northern Kazakhstan ~3500 to 3000 BCE (5, 10, 23, 31–33). There was extensive debate over whether Botai horses were hunted or herded (33), but more recent studies have evidenced harnessing and milking (10, 17), the presence of likely corrals, and genetic domestication selection at the horse TRPM1 coat-color locus (32). Although horse husbandry has been demonstrated at Botai, it is also now clear from genetic studies that this was not the source of modern domestic horse stock (32). Some have suggested that the Botai were local hunter-gatherers who learned horse husbandry from an early eastward spread of western pastoralists, such as the Copper Age herders buried at Khvalynsk (~5150 to 3950 BCE), closely related to Yamnaya and Afanasievo (17). Others have suggested an in situ transition from the local hunter-gatherer community (5).
We therefore examined the genetic relationship between Yamnaya and Botai. First, we note that whereas Yamnaya is best modeled as an approximately equal mix of EHG and Caucasian HG ancestry and that the earlier Khvalynsk samples from the same area also show Caucasian ancestry, the Botai_CA samples show no signs of admixture with a Caucasian source (fig. S14). Similarly, while the Botai_CA have some Ancient East Asian ancestry, there is no sign of this in Khvalynsk or Yamnaya. Our momi model (Fig. 4) suggests that, although YamnayaKaragash_EBA shared ANE ancestry with Botai_CA from MA1 through EHG, their lineages diverge ~15,000 years ago in the Paleolithic. According to a parametric bootstrap, the amount of gene flow between YamnayaKaragash_EBA and Botai_CA inferred using the sample frequency spectrum (SFS) was not significantly different from 0 (P = 0.18 using 300 parametric bootstraps under a null model without admixture) (fig. S18). Additionally, the best-fitting SFS model without any recent gene flow fits the ratio of ABBA-BABA counts for (SidelkinoEHG_ML, YamnayaKaragash_EBA; Botai_CA, AncestralAllele), with Z = 0.45 using a block jackknife for this statistic. Consistent with this, a simple qpGraph model without direct gene flow between Botai_CA and Yamnaya, but with shared EHG-related ancestry between them, fits all f4 statistics (fig. S28), and qpAdm (2) successfully fits models for Yamnaya ancestry without any Botai_CA contribution (table S12).
The separation between Botai and Yamnaya is further reinforced by a lack of overlap in Y-chromosomal lineages (Fig. 5A). Although our YamnayaKaragash_EBA sample carries the R1b1a2a2c1 lineage seen in other Yamnaya and present-day Eastern Europeans, one of the two Botai_CA males belongs to the basal N lineage, whose subclades have a predominantly Northern Eurasian distribution, whereas the second carries the R1b1a1 haplogroup, restricted almost exclusively to Central Asian and Siberian populations (34). Neither of these Botai lineages has been observed among Yamnaya males (table S13 and fig. S25).
Using ChromoPainter (35) (figs. S29 to S32) and rare variant sharing (36) (figs. S33 to S35), we also identify a disparity in affinities with present-day populations between our high-coverage Yamnaya and Botai genomes. Consistent with previous results (1, 2), we observe a contribution from YamnayaKaragash_EBA to present-day Europeans. Conversely, Botai_CA shows greater affinity to Central Asian, Siberian, and Native American populations, coupled with some sharing with northeastern European groups at a lower level than that for Yamnaya, due to their ANE ancestry.
Further toward the Altai, the genomes of two CentralSteppe_EMBA women, who were buried in Afanasievo-like pit graves, revealed them to be representatives of an unadmixed Inner Asian ANE-related group, almost indistinguishable from the Okunevo_EMBA of the Minusinsk Basin north of the Altai through D statistics (fig. S11). This lack of genetic and cultural congruence may be relevant to the interpretation of Afanasievo-type graves elsewhere in Central Asia and Mongolia (37). However, in contrast to the lack of identifiable admixture from Yamnaya and Afanasievo in the CentralSteppe_EMBA, there is an admixture signal of 10 to 20% Yamnaya and Afanasievo in the Okunevo_EMBA samples (fig. S21), consistent with evidence of western steppe influence. This signal is not seen on the X chromosome (qpAdm P value for admixture on X 0.33 compared to 0.02 for autosomes), suggesting a male-derived admixture, also consistent with the fact that 1 of 10 Okunevo_EMBA males carries a R1b1a2a2 Y chromosome related to those found in western pastoralists (Fig. 5). In contrast, there is no evidence of western steppe admixture among the more eastern Baikal region Bronze Age (~2200 to 1800 BCE) samples (fig. S14).
The lack of evidence of admixture between Botai horse herders and western steppe pastoralists is consistent with these latter migrating through the central steppe but not settling until they reached the Altai to the east (4). Notably, this lack of admixture suggests that horses were domesticated by hunter-gatherers not previously familiar with farming, as were the cases for dogs (38) and reindeer (39). Domestication of the horse thus may best parallel that of the reindeer, a food animal that can be milked and ridden, which has been proposed to be domesticated by hunters via the “prey path” (40); indeed, anthropologists note similarities in cosmological beliefs between hunters and reindeer herders (41). In contrast, most animal domestications were achieved by settled agriculturalists (5).
|
|